tyrand

A “rugged individualist” was so eager to be unfounded that he decided to channel the old soviet union in my comment section.  I don’t think it worked.


This user is the same blogger from the dillahunty fansite I referenced in an older post.

They apparently started by trying to wish hell on me, and when they realized that was not a smart idea they tried to claim I was too mentally unfit to live.  That comment is linked and screen-captured above.

For those that don’t know, once kruschev had to close down the gulags as the public found out about them, the soviets needed a new means of “relocating” those deemed “inconvenient” to the state.  The solution was to re-purpose the serbsky institute as a political prison.

If a party member was threatened, they would simply need to accuse the one to be marked as “schitzophrenic” or “paranoid schitzophrenic” and the person would be whisked away to be lobotomized, tortured, experimented on, used for kgb practice, and then executed.  Such a lovely fate the monster was trying to consign me to, but their curses are easily sent back to whence they came.

I would ask where the monster learned such enough about the common execution tactics of the soviet union circa 1960, but going by his ghoulish hunger for the deaths of children and his mention of involvement in the occult, I don’t have to wonder much.

18 thoughts on “A modern soviet tries an old trick and fails

    1. Accusing me of what you are doing will not help you. Worse for you is wishing damnation on me simply because I ran afoul of your ego. I deleted that part of your post because it is so vile.

      Like

  1. Oh they haven’t learned, they haven’t been taught. They haven’t thought. They hardened their hearts. It’s like abortion, it’s much easier to have sex than to raise a child. The Child is sacrificed for the life of the Mother. I mean it’s no different than whatever they have had going on in this department for the last 5000 years. It’s the easiest way out,they have to call you crazy. It’s also intellectually lazy. I fear that my heart is becoming hardened in the last days cause of the increase of lawlessness. Men are so proud…

    Like

    1. I do feel the same as you, but seeing another feeling disheartened makes me feel stronger. I know I have to be there for you as well so I just throw my own problems away as they get in the way of helping others. Stick in there, please.

      Like

  2. After browsing your blog here, all four Main menu items at the top, for around 15-20 minutes in order to better understand who you are and why you write with so much anger—I hope you are not suffering from chronic hypertension and high blood-pressure—I decided this WP blog is essentially an echo-chamber of all the sensationalizing shock-jocks, e.g. Joe Pynes, Rush Limbaughs, Bill O’Reillys, Sean Hannitys, and Megyn Kellys, et al ad nauseum… all of which equate to Howard Stern. That doesn’t say much, but they sure are loud, incessant crash-cymbals. 😄

    Do you possibly have another blog with a lot less anger and more rational, objective content? I’d be very interested in that if you do. Thanks.

    Like

    1. A Lesson for free, I will charge for more of them a post-graduate tutoring rate:
      Faith is founding oneself in God & is the highest thought that allows all other thought to exist at all.
      Reason, broadest thought, pure intellect, is totally blind without Faith to light it up.
      Logic is the least, simplest form as it is simple induction/deduction via observation.

      So you, with your capital sin of pride (delusion of arrogated Divine Will) have “decided” that my blog is an “echo-chamber,” and with your pretend divine proclamation you assume you have shut up me and the Heavens? Like I keep telling your friends (you use them like tools, you have no real friends): dissociation is not refutation.

      Venerable Fulton Sheen knew of you:
      “voltaire boasted that if he could find but ten wicked words a day he could crush the “infamy” of Christianity. He found the ten words daily, and even a daily dozen, but he never found an argument, and so the words went the way of all words and the thing, Christianity, survived. Today, no one advances even a poor argument to prove that there is no God, but they are legion who think they have sealed up the heavens when they used the word “anthropomorphism.” This word is just a sample of the catalogue of names whichserve as the excuse for those who are too lazy to think. One moment’s reflection would tell them that one can no more get rid of God by calling Him “anthropomorphic” than he can get rid of a sore throat by calling it “streptococci.” As regards the use of the term “anthropomorphism,” I cannot see that its use in theology is less justified than the use in physics of the term “organism,” which the new physicists are so fond of employing. Certain words like “reactionary” or “medieval” are tagged on the Catholic Church and used with that same disrespect with which a man may sneer at a woman’s age. Mothers do not cease to be mothers because their sons grow up, and the Mother Church of the Christian world, which began not in Boston but in Jerusalem, is not to be dispossessed of her glorious title simply because her sons leave home. Some day they may be glad to return and their return will be the truest “homecoming” the world has ever seen.”

      To not be angry in the face of evil makes you fully complicit in it, to also not do all you can to stop evil makes you fully complicit in it.

      This is Just War, something you do not understand because you invite it on yourself.

      Like

      1. So…

        You do NOT have another blog with a lot less anger and over the top mumbo-jumbo and with more rational, objective content? 😉

        And on a final note, I’m not here to “execute you” for attempting to “inform,” or “staying up,” or what you “say” to yourself or others, or that you are “Catholic, sane(?), or right-wing,” or that you have “memory” or that you “quote” a lot of others 😄—personal opinions of self, others, and the world are YOUR personal opinions. You are welcome to them. None of them are or ever will be Universal because I’ll bet YOU are not universal to judge that, obviously.

        I just asked a very simple question. I’ll take this extremely long-winded, overly generalized, op-ed reply as a “no.” 🤭

        Regards

        Like

        1. So far this is three or four lessons. I am deadly serious about charging you for this so how are we going to pay?

          I put more thought into every single word than you have into your entire life. If I say something to you, I mean it, and I expect you to read and address it in full.

          Universal means “according to the whole.” I am Universal, as that is just the Latin word for the Ancient Greek Catholic. you are a perpetual liar and blasphemer, and without anything of note besides lies you aren’t aware won’t make shame over sin go away.

          your repeated implications that I am insane for simply being Catholic is typical with your marxist shtick. it is not, however, Substantive to be totally incapable of reading what I have written to you in order to passive-aggressively attack me and my person because you have none, no, zero argument.

          you also use a very specific post-modernist/marxist quip here:
          you call Love, Absolute Truth, and Natural Law as “nigel’s opinion,” all while calling your wishful thinking and third rate lies of fifth rate liars as “professor taboo’s truth.”

          Faith is Founding oneself in God, Faith is the basis of all thought, wicked words are not arguments, the capital sin of pride and the mortal sin of despair will not change reality or damn me in your place.

          Let me let Venerable Fulton Sheen talk to you:
          “The nature of certain things is fixed, and none more so than the nature of truth. Truth may be contradicted a thousand times, but that only proves that it is strong enough to survive a thousand assaults. But for any one to say, “Some say this, some say that, therefore, there is no truth,” is about as logical as it would have been for Columbus who heard some say, “The earth is round”, and others say “The earth is flat” to conclude: “Therefore, there is no earth at all.”

          It is this kind of thinking that cannot distinguish between a sheep and his second coat of wool, between Napoleon and his three-cornered hat, between the substance and the accident, the kind that has begotten minds so flattened with broadness that they have lost all their depth. Like a carpenter who might throw away his rule and use each beam as a measuring-rod, so, too, those who have thrown away the standard of objective truth have nothing left with which to measure but the mental fashion of the moment.

          The giggling giddiness of novelty, the sentimental restlessness of a mind unhinged, and the unnatural fear of a good dose of hard thinking, all conjoin to produce a group of sophomoric latitudinarians who think there is no difference between God as Cause and God as a “mental projection”; who equate Christ and Buddha, St. Paul and John Dewey, and then enlarge their broad-mindedness into a sweeping synthesis that says not only that one Christian sect is just as good as another, but even that one world-religion is just as good as another. The great god “Progress” is then enthroned on the altars of fashion, and as the hectic worshipers are asked, “Progress towards what?” The tolerant answer comes back, “More progress.” All the while sane men are wondering how there can be progress without direction and how there can be direction without a fixed point. And because they speak of a “fixed point,” they are said to be behind the times, when really they are beyond the times mentally and spiritually.”

          Like

          1. Two things to you from Venerable Fulton Sheen:
            “If some of us who are blessed with its sacred privileges believed the same things about the Church that her slanderers believe, if we knew her only through the words of traitors or third-rate lies of dishonest historians, if we understood her only through those who were never cradled in her sacred associations, we would perhaps hate the Church just as much as they do. The bitterest enemies of the Church, those who accuse her of being unpatriotic, as Christ was accused of being before Pilate; of being unworldly, as Christ was accused of being before Herod; of being too dogmatic, as Christ was accused of being before Caiaphas; or being too undogmatic, as Christ was accused of being Annas; of being possessed by the devil, as Christ was accused of being before the Pharisees — these do not really hate the Church. They cannot hate the Church any more than they can hate Christ; they hate only that which they mistakenly believe to be the Catholic Church, and their hate is but their vain attempt to ignore. Charity, then, must be shown to persons, and particularly to those outside the fold who by charity must be led back, that there may be one fold and one Shepherd.”

            and

            “But it is anything but progress to act like mice and eat the foundations of the very roof over our heads. Intolerance about principles is the foundation of growth, and the mathematician who would deride a square for always having four sides, and in the name of progress would encourage it to throw away even only one of its sides, would soon discover that he had lost all his squares. So too with the dogmas of the Church, of science, and of reason; they are like bricks, solid things with which a man can build, not like straw, which is “religious experience,” fit only for burning.

            A dogma, then, is the necessary consequence of the intolerance of first principles, and that science or that church which has the greatest amount of dogmas is the science or the church that has been doing the most thinking. The Catholic Church, the schoolmaster for twenty centuries, has been doing a tremendous amount of solid, hard thinking and hence has built up dogmas as a man might build a house of brick but grounded on a rock. She has seen the centuries with their passing enthusiasms and momentary loyalties pass before her, making the same mistakes, cultivating the same poses, falling into the same mental snares, so that she has become very patient and kind to the erring pupils, but very intolerant and severe concerning the false. She has been and she will always be intolerant so far as the rights of God are concerned, for heresy, error, untruth, affect not personal matters on which she may yield, but a Divine Right in which there is no yielding. Meek she is to the erring, but violent to the error. The truth is divine; the heretic is human. Due reparation made, she will admit the heretic back into the treasury of her souls, but never the heresy into the treasury of her wisdom. Right is right if nobody is right, and wrong is wrong if everybody is wrong. And in this day and age we need, as Mr. Chesterton tells us, “not a Church that is right when the world is right, but a Church that is right when the world is wrong.””

            But also:
            Sáncte Míchael Archángele,
            defénde nos in proélio,
            cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
            Ímperet ílli Déus,
            súpplices deprecámur:
            tuque, prínceps milítiæ cæléstis,
            sátanam aliósque spíritus malígnos,
            qui ad perditiónem animárum pervagántur in múndo,
            Divína virtúte,
            in inférnum detrúde.
            Ámen.

            Crux Sacra Sit Mihi Lux
            Non Draco Sit Mihi Dux
            Sunt Mala Quae Libas
            Ipse Venena Biba!
            Vade Retro satana
            Nunquam Suade Mihi Vana
            Amen

            Like

          2. Does your Pope follow your blog? Or does your parish priest, diocesan bishop, archbishop, or cardinal follow it? Have you ever asked any of them to assess your blog and comments? If so, what do they think of your blog and what you say? I’m very curious. 🙂

            And if so, please be honest about what they told you. Thanks.

            Like

          3. This is a strange personal attack I see from your kind often. I may make a separate post on it.

            So I post two quotes from one of The Holiest and The Smartest men to EVER be on earth, Venerable Fulton Sheen. A Living Saint who was beloved even by his enemies.

            Then I post Two Prayers: The St Michael Prayer said after every Mass, and The St Benedict Prayer found on any Medal of St Benedict. Not only are these some of the most popular Prayers, they are the most popular Devotionals, and are so strong they are used in exorcisms.

            I also note you did not even see the THREE separate replies I made to you in another article:
            https://nigelteapot.wordpress.com/2020/11/26/damned-means-marked-for-death/

            So what are you implying here? that the Pope is a satanist? he was a communist and he is an abject travesty at his job, which is to be a Faithful Umpire for The Church. Are Priests, Bishops, Archbishops (why mention Bishops twice?), or Cardinals (what the hell do Cardinals have to do with Laymen or local affairs?) satanists? Some, yes, but not all.

            Really, I make possibly the most Catholic Reply to you that I possibly could, and then you claim that this is somehow against Catholicism? What are you expecting? some soviet internment at a gulag where I will be lobotomized for daring to challenge an old hippie pedophile named “taboo”s ego “ye will be like gods” “will to power.”

            fuck you straight to the hell you were born to die in.

            you were allowed to be born here instead of directly in hell to allow you to Repent. you have chosen poorly for yourself, and have given us all the gift of being Eternally free of you.

            Remember this:
            d*th, Judgement, Heaven or h*ll.

            Contrition, Conversion, Confession, Penance, Repentance.

            Once more from Venerable Fulton Sheen:
            “If some of us who are blessed with its sacred privileges believed the same things about the Church that her slanderers believe, if we knew her only through the words of traitors or third-rate lies of dishonest historians, if we understood her only through those who were never cradled in her sacred associations, we would perhaps hate the Church just as much as they do. The bitterest enemies of the Church, those who accuse her of being unpatriotic, as Christ was accused of being before Pilate; of being unworldly, as Christ was accused of being before Herod; of being too dogmatic, as Christ was accused of being before Caiaphas; or being too undogmatic, as Christ was accused of being Annas; of being possessed by the devil, as Christ was accused of being before the Pharisees — these do not really hate the Church. They cannot hate the Church any more than they can hate Christ; they hate only that which they mistakenly believe to be the Catholic Church, and their hate is but their vain attempt to ignore. Charity, then, must be shown to persons, and particularly to those outside the fold who by charity must be led back, that there may be one fold and one Shepherd.”

            and

            “But it is anything but progress to act like mice and eat the foundations of the very roof over our heads. Intolerance about principles is the foundation of growth, and the mathematician who would deride a square for always having four sides, and in the name of progress would encourage it to throw away even only one of its sides, would soon discover that he had lost all his squares. So too with the dogmas of the Church, of science, and of reason; they are like bricks, solid things with which a man can build, not like straw, which is “religious experience,” fit only for burning.

            A dogma, then, is the necessary consequence of the intolerance of first principles, and that science or that church which has the greatest amount of dogmas is the science or the church that has been doing the most thinking. The Catholic Church, the schoolmaster for twenty centuries, has been doing a tremendous amount of solid, hard thinking and hence has built up dogmas as a man might build a house of brick but grounded on a rock. She has seen the centuries with their passing enthusiasms and momentary loyalties pass before her, making the same mistakes, cultivating the same poses, falling into the same mental snares, so that she has become very patient and kind to the erring pupils, but very intolerant and severe concerning the false. She has been and she will always be intolerant so far as the rights of God are concerned, for heresy, error, untruth, affect not personal matters on which she may yield, but a Divine Right in which there is no yielding. Meek she is to the erring, but violent to the error. The truth is divine; the heretic is human. Due reparation made, she will admit the heretic back into the treasury of her souls, but never the heresy into the treasury of her wisdom. Right is right if nobody is right, and wrong is wrong if everybody is wrong. And in this day and age we need, as Mr. Chesterton tells us, “not a Church that is right when the world is right, but a Church that is right when the world is wrong.””

            But also:
            Sáncte Míchael Archángele,
            defénde nos in proélio,
            cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
            Ímperet ílli Déus,
            súpplices deprecámur:
            tuque, prínceps milítiæ cæléstis,
            sátanam aliósque spíritus malígnos,
            qui ad perditiónem animárum pervagántur in múndo,
            Divína virtúte,
            in inférnum detrúde.
            Ámen.

            Crux Sacra Sit Mihi Lux
            Non Draco Sit Mihi Dux
            Sunt Mala Quae Libas
            Ipse Venena Biba!
            Vade Retro satana
            Nunquam Suade Mihi Vana
            Amen

            Like

          4. 🥱

            😄 Okay, but you never answered the question(s). I’ll repeat it for you…

            Does your Pope follow your blog? Or does your parish priest, diocesan bishop, archbishop, or cardinal follow it? Have you ever asked any of them to assess your blog and comments? If so, what do they think of your blog and what you say? I’m very curious. 🙂

            And if so, please be honest about what they told you. Thanks.

            Focus Nigel! 😉

            Like

          5. Not only did I answer you in full, but I did so TWICE; like I keep saying dissociation is not refutation.

            I even made a whole blog post devoted to my answer to you, as you aren’t the first to try this very absurd line of questioning:
            https://www.nigelteapot.wordpress.com/2020/12/09/does-your-priest-read-your-blog-copy-your-message-to-your-priest-and-tell-me-what-they-say/

            My response is *the pinned post*.

            What caused this beyond-absurd response of yours was My Posting of TWO quotes of one of the Holiest and Smartest of Saints and TWO Prayers so strong that they are used in Exorcisms. So, once more, are you trying to imply? If they disapprove, those Parish Priests (Why not All Priests like those belonging to an Order?), Bishops, Archbishops, Cardinals, and The Pope are going to hell same as you’ve spent your whole life for.

            Amusingly, I saw a post of yours on another blog from four years ago. you eccstatic about sexual sin (especially sodomy and any kind of cult of baphomet “transhumanism”) and claim your employers and your Christian “ex” Wife needed to be hid from your views.

            So, what was it that made you go reprobate? no doubt some kind of sexual sin, but was it with a man or a woman you were unfaithful to your wife with?

            Like people who hate God because of issues with their Biological Fathers, you have a problem with Faith because you have a lack of Foundation. was it you have a problem with being unfaithful to Marriage too, Right?

            Like

          6. Sorry. You bad grammar and sentence structure makes what you are attempting to say quite incoherent. Go back over what you wrote and rewrite it correctly, with much improved grammar Nigel. Then maybe I’ll come back and read it. Otherwise, I’m not wasting my time with someone who cannot construct proper grammatical sentences.

            Have a good day. 🙂

            Like

          7. dissociation is still not refutation, sneering is still not an argument, I speak in plain english and use terms appropriately. This is a very complex topic, and you calling me an idiot because I am outside of your paradigm is not a sign of strength.

            Last I checked The Church Is ALWAYS Catholic. If the Priests and Prelates you think are so squarely satanic that they would scream like a demon about to be exorcised upon realing Venerable Fulton Sheen or two of the most Powerful Prayers (So much so they are used in exorcisms), then they are not Catholic.

            Again, I saw a post of yours on another blog from four years ago. you eccstatic about sexual sin (especially sodomy and any kind of cult of baphomet “transhumanism”) and claim your employers and your Christian “ex” Wife needed to be hid from your views.

            So, what was it that made you go reprobate? no doubt some kind of sexual sin, but was it with a man or a woman you were unfaithful to your wife with?

            Like people who hate God because of issues with their Biological Fathers, you have a problem with Faith because you have a lack of Foundation. was it you have a problem with being unfaithful to Marriage too, Right?

            Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.